American writer: The Trump administration has rushed behind the Segenal scandal policy

American writer David Ignatius said that President Donald Trump’s administration’s keenness to work and move very quickly and bypassing bureaucratic administrative mechanisms made them hang in a bad situation as a result of a reckless act of its manufacture represented in the Segnal case and a journalist by mistake in a very sensitive but unsafe chat group.

He added in its column in the Washington Post that the prevailing spirit in the Silicon Valley – the homeland is the largest leading technology companies in the state of California – represented by the saying “move quickly and destroy things”, is now adopted by the government of government efficiency billionaire Elon Musk and many of Trump’s agents, who have remained over the past two months leading the recklessness of efforts to reformulate the external and interior policies For the United States.

He commented sarcastically by saying that they all succeeded in that, as they were able to tear the bureaucracy very quickly and left a lot of debris.

Hurry

The writer criticized the style of jumping on the steps used by senior officials, and considered it an urgent behavior that will not be resulted in the desired results because of their conquering about following the exhausting procedures, and bypassing them as institutions such as Congress and courts.

Those officials blamed the Signal Non -Governmental App for encrypted messages instead of entering the sensitive fragmented information facility, which is a closed area within a building used to process the types of sensitive fragmented information from confidential information.

According to Agnatius, Trump and his team want quick results, so since his inauguration they have been looking at the controls of dealing with sensitive information as a waste of time, and that it was formulated for the infantry soldiers to adhere to it and not the leaders of change.

He continued his attack on US administration officials, claiming that they withdrew information from the intelligence services, the military and civil administrations without clear observance of the reasons for security, privacy or precedents.

The Segnal scandal

This contempt reached its climax – according to Ignatius – in the Sagenal scandal that took place this week, when it was entrusted with the National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, an arduous task of coordinating Trump’s varying threads to satisfy a president who wants quick and immediate results.

To carry out this task, Waltz established an internal chat room on the Segenal application to discuss the strikes of Ansar Allah (Al -Houthi) in Yemen. Participants in that room were called the “Small Houthi Group”, and included it inadvertently the editor -in -chief of the “Atlantic” magazine, Jeffrey Goldberg, who later leaked what they traded in their group chat.

According to the author of the article, the most anxiety is that Waltz and others had to realize that it is wrong to use the messaging application of such sensitive discussions, because most of them dealt for years with classified classified information, and they are aware of the controls followed with a platform like Segnal.