US President Donald Trump described the referee against the leader of the French National Assembly party, Marine Le Pen as the same as the same in the United States.
“This is a major issue, a very huge issue, and I am fully aware of it,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday, April 1, at his press conference.
Trump intentionally describing the case as “large, huge”, in confirmation that the trial of Le Pen is beyond the charge of corruption and electoral bribery. Rather, the judicial ruling falls within a European policy aimed at the political exclusion of every right -wing thought that is in harmony with the traumatic thought and is taking place in this astronomy.
For this, Trump considered the court’s decision that by emphasizing the full knowledge of the case, as it falls within the new conflict between his country and Europe on many issues that begins with European accusation of Trump’s policy that it wants to destroy democratic values, and may not end with the European rejection of the American scenario of the end of the war in Ukraine.
Whoever follows the relationship between the United States of America in the Trump and European Union, realizes that the “sword of divorce” signed between the two ally forces. Especially after calls in more than one European country escalated to build a European bloc independent of American influence, the chances of building a European army increased at the expense of abandoning the idea of NATO.
Some consider that the European reaction came after the goals of the traumatic policy that work to rearrange its relationship with the Western alliance on the basis of strengthening the “dependency” tendency from European countries, and not as a matter of building friendship.
The European Union believes that what President Trump holds does not stop at the limits of destabilizing the historical relationship in the Western alliance between Washington and the European Union, but rather seeks to spread values that are in the opposite bank of the democratic values that European countries sing.
And that war led by US billionaire Illon Musk, using his influence, falls in the context of the “soft” trauma policy to carry out the attack on European governments calling for the formation of a deterrent front in the face of Trump’s Donkechuchi.
This, and the leader of the extreme right in France, Marine Le Pen, was condemning the judicial ruling against her, accusing him of “a political decision” after being sentenced to Monday, March 31, by preventing her from running for five years with an immediate impact.
Le Pen told the French channel “TF1”: “I will not allow the maximum of this way, I will resort to possible ways of recession. There is a little but existing possibility,” noting that “practices we believed were exclusive to authoritarian regimes.”
Away from the decision to condemn and the charges it carries with the embezzlement of public funds, and the imprisonment provisions that included the practice of political action for five years, Le Pen’s objection may have affected the truth when it considered that the decision was “purely political”, especially since the rise of her party in the recent French presidential elections, caused anxiety with the French left that “did not include him” and united its ranks to prevent its arrival.
Europe has witnessed a wave of the rise of the extreme right -wing parties, which achieved in the recent European Parliament elections, as the alternative for Germany “AFD” achieved great gains in Germany, where its votes rose 14%, and the National Rally led by Luban won the weak voices of French President Emmanuel Macron, and the Italian brothers party led by Georgia Meloni won the elections in Italy, as well The Austrian freedom is the number of its deputies.
It does not stop at the European obsession from the great rise of the far -right wave, and the associated with the fight against democratic values that distinguish the European continent, but rather by apprehension of the other different from what this right holds of ideas that are in the interest of “tramp” policy.
This is what former German counselor Olaf Schultz, who was accused last January, has certain forces in America, that they were deliberately destroyed by Western democratic institutions. The words of Schultz comes in response to a conversation between Mask and the head of the right -wing “Alternative for Germany” party, Alice Fayed.
This, and British Prime Minister Kerr Starmer joined other European leaders in expressing anger from Musk after “interference” in their country’s political discourse, considering that the richest man in the world “exceeded the limit” after his comments on dealing with the gangs of children’s exploitation gangs in Britain.
These statements come amid accusations made by French President Emmanuel Macron to Musk by interfering in the electoral affairs of European countries, as did the Norwegian Prime Minister Youunas Gar Store, accusing Musk of using his influence in order to control freedom on the continent.
In the context of the systematic European campaign against American interventions, it is no longer unlikely that what the electric car company owned by “Musk” is attacked in European countries, which may be intended to exercise more pressure on a mask to brake his interventions.
What is certain is that it is a European opinion that rejects American intervention. What the Italian police announced that a fire broke out at dawn on Monday, March 31, at an exhibition of “Tesla” cars near the capital, Rome, may be fabricated, although preliminary investigations did not reach the identification of the active authority.
According to Italian media, the accident resulted in a complete destruction of 17 “Tesla” electric cars without human injuries. After France and Germany, it is Italy facing deliberate attacks on this type of car, owned by billionaire Musk.
Le Pen in France represents this extremism of the extreme right, who finds its way in the ideas offered by the tram policy, and for this the level of real fear that the rise of the parties has increased in this field.
Is it permissible to link the judicial ruling against Le Pen with the burning operations of “Tesla” cars, as they are “quiet” European messages with the aim of paying to amend the Trump policy?
The opinions in the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al -Jazeera.
(Tagstotranslate) Policy (T) Europe (T) France